Research in Physical Education, Sport and Health
2025, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 3–9
ISSN (Print): 1857-8152; ISSN (Online): 1857-8160

Original scientific paper

Open Access

PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTY TESTING OF THE KIDSCREEN-27 INSTRUMENT IN 11-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN IN KOSOVO
Ardonit Xhemajli¹ ORCID iD, Mitrichka Dzambazovska Stardelova² ORCID iD, Slavica Novacevska² ORCID iD, Visar Ganiu³ ORCID iD
¹ Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Pristina, Kosovo
² Faculty of Physical Education, Sport and Health, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
³ Faculty of Physical Education, University of Tetovo, Tetovo, Republic of North Macedonia
: https://doi.org/10.46733/PESH2514203xh                        

Download PDF

HTML

Abstract

Designed to assess health-related quality of life among young populations, the Albanian version of the KIDSCREEN-27 ensures dependable evaluations in culturally diverse environments. The aim of the study was to examine the suitability of the instrument in evaluating various dimensions of health-related quality of life. The research included 143 eleven-year-old students from public primary schools in Gjilan, Republic of Kosovo.The study used advanced and robust statistical methods, such as Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (EFA and CFA) to assess the structure of the construct, along with measuring internal consistency through Cronbach’s coefficient, while the use of T-scores enabled cross-cultural comparisons, relying on appropriate statistical tools such as SPSS and Jamovi for psychometric assessment. Statistical analysis showed that the six-factor adaptation of the KIDSCREEN-27 provides a better fit for the data from 11-year-old children in Kosovo compared to the original five-factor framework. This updated model exhibited strong fit indicators (CFI = 0.98; RMSEA = 0.075) alongside a more distinct conceptual organization. Additionally, the internal reliability was satisfactory (α = 0.71–0.82), with minimal presence of ceiling or floor effects.Factor loadings were higher and more stable in the six-factor model. Several significant gender differences were identified, with boys scoring higher in certain dimensions. Overall, the instrument proves to be suitable and valid for use within the cultural and social context Republik of Kosovo.
Keywords:
Quality of Life; Gender Differences; Cultural and Social Context; KIDSCREEN-27; Children; Kosovo

______________________________________________

References

Befus, E. G., Helseth, S., Mølland, E., Westergren, T., Fegran, L., & Haraldstad, K. (2023). Use of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: A scoping review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 21, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02088-z

Budler, L. C., Pajnkihar, M., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Barr, O., & Stiglic, G. (2022). The KIDSCREEN-27 scale: Translation and validation study of the Slovenian version. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-01973-3

Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2005). Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1225–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-4773-0

DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). Sage. Duncan, O. D. (1984). Notes on social measurement: Historical and critical. Russell Sage Foundation.

Edwards, T. C., Huebner, C. E., Connell, F. A., & Patrick, D. L. (2002). Adolescent quality of life, part I: Conceptual and measurement model. Journal of Adolescence, 25(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2002.0470

Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 84(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.84.3.205

Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Mulhern, R. K., Barr, R. D., & Hudson, M. (1999). A framework for assessing health-related quality of life among children with cancer. International Journal of Cancer, 83(Suppl. 12), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(1999)83:12+<2::AID-IJC2>3.0.CO;2-M

Garber, A. M., & Phelps, C. E. (1997). Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Health Economics, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00506-1

Higginson, I. J., & Carr, A. J. (2001). Measuring quality of life: Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ, 322(7297), 1297–1300. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1297

Huebner, E. S., Valois, R. F., Suldo, S. M., Smith, L. C., McKnight, C. G., Seligson, J. L., & Zullig, K. J. (2004). Perceived quality of life: A neglected component of adolescent health assessment and intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(4), 270–278 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.07.007

Jafari, P., Bagheri, Z., & Safe, M. (2012). Item and response-category functioning of the Persian version of the KIDSCREEN-27: Rasch partial credit model. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10, 127. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-127

Jokovic, A., Locker, D., & Guyatt, G. (2006). Short forms of the child perceptions questionnaire for 11–14-year-old children (CPQ11–14): Development and initial evaluation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-4

Kaplan, R. M., & Bush, J. W. (1982). Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis. Health Psychology, 1(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.1.1.61

Khan, S., Tangiisuran, B., Imtiaz, A., & Zainal, H. (2017). Health status and quality of life in tuberculosis: Systematic review of study design, instruments, measuring properties and outcomes. Health Science Journal, 11(1), Article 484. https://doi.org/10.21767/1791-809X.1000484

Landgraf, J. M., Maunsell, E., Speechley, K. N., Bullinger, M., Campbell, S., Abetz, L., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (1998). Canadian-French, German and UK versions of the Child Health Questionnaire: Methodology and preliminary item scaling results. Quality of Life Research, 7, 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008810004694

Li, J., Zhu, Y., Zhu, G., Qiu, Z., Wang, J., Kaman, A., … & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2024). Measuring health-related quality of life in a Chinese Mainland adolescent population: Psychometric properties of the Mandarin Chinese self-reported KIDSCREEN-27 and KIDSCREEN-10 index. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 600. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01876-6

Locker, D., & Allen, P. F. (2002). Developing short-form measures of oral health-related quality of life. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 62(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2002.tb03415.x

Michalos, A. C. (Ed.). (2014). Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5

Muehlan, H. (2010). Developing the DCGM-12: A short-form of the DISABKIDS condition-generic module assessing health related quality of life in children and adolescents with chronic conditions [Doctoral dissertation, University of Hamburg]. Universität Hamburg. https://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/handle/ediss/3344

Ng, J. Y., Burnett, A., Ha, A. S., & Sum, K. W. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Chinese (Cantonese) versions of the KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 24, 2415–2421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0973-z

Patrick, D. L., Edwards, T. C., & Topolski, T. D. (2002). Adolescent quality of life, part II: Initial validation of a new instrument. Journal of Adolescence, 25(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2002.0471.

Pollak, E., Mühlan, H., Von Mackensen, S., Bullinger, M., & The Haemo-QoL Group. (2006). The Haemo-QoL Index: Developing a short measure for health-related quality of life assessment in children and adolescents with haemophilia. Haemophilia, 12(4), 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01292.x

Power, R., Akhter, R., Muhit, M., Badawi, N., & Khandaker, G. (2019). Cross-cultural validation of the Bengali version KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life questionnaire. BMC Pediatrics, 19, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1373-7 Ravens-Sieberer, U., Auquier, P., Erhart, M., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Bruil, J., … & European KIDSCREEN Group. (2007). The

KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: Psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Quality of Life Research, 16(8), 1347–1356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9240-6

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., Auquier, P., Bruil, J., … & European KIDSCREEN Group. (2010). Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: A short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 19, 1487–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9706-5

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Erhart, M., Bruil, J., Duer, W., … & European KIDSCREEN Group. (2005). KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 5(3), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.5.3.353

Ravens-Sieberer, U., Herdman, M., Devine, J., Otto, C., Bullinger, M., Rose, M., & The European KIDSCREEN Group. (2014). The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: Development, current application, and future advances. Quality of Life Research, 23, 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0428-3

Shannon, S., Ó Laoide, A., Fitzpatrick, C., & Dooley, B. (2017). Testing the psychometric properties of KIDSCREEN-27 with Irish children of low socio-economic status. Quality of Life Research, 26, 1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1432-1

Solans, M., Pane, S., Estrada, M. D., Serra-Sutton, V., Berra, S., Herdman, M., Alonso, J., & Rajmil, L. (2008). Health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: A systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments. Value in Health, 11(4), 742–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00293.x

Taylor, R. M., Gibson, F., & Franck, L. S. (2008). A concept analysis of health-related quality of life in young people with chronic illness. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(14), 1823–1833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02379.x

Tengs, T. O. (2004). Cost-effectiveness versus cost–utility analysis of interventions for cancer: Does adjusting for health-related quality of life really matter? Value in Health, 7(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.71246.x

The KIDSCREEN Group Europe. (2006). The KIDSCREEN questionnaires: Quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents. Pabst Science Publishers.

Torrance, G. W. (1997). Preferences for health outcomes and cost–utility analysis. American Journal of Managed Care, 3(Suppl.5), S8–S20. https://www.ajmc.com/view/may97-1381ps008-s020

Varni, J. W., Limbers, C. A., & Burwinkle, T. M. (2007). Impaired health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with chronic conditions: A comparative analysis of 10 disease clusters and 33 disease categories/severities utilizing the PedsQL 4.0 generic core scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-43

Verstraete, J., Ramma, L., & Jelsma, J. (2020). Item generation for a proxy health related quality of life measure in very young children. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-1271-1